Phillip Evans vs. Ray Hoffman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Phillip Evans posted the stronger offensive profile against Ray Hoffman. Phillip Evans posted stronger numbers in OPS (.653 vs .153) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .100). By the career numbers, Phillip Evans had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Phillip Evans and Ray Hoffman
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
121
205.67
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
7
210
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
353
600
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
20
600
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.053
0.053
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.677
0.677
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
35.05
59.57
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
3.13
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
117
198.87
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
2
60
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.331
0.331
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.319
0.319
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.053
0.053
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.603
0.603
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
4.64
4.64
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
20
20
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
0.51
0.51
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 600 PA
5
8.5
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Phillip Evans and Ray Hoffman
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 9 Innings
91
1.29
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 9 Innings
265
3.75
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 9 Innings
255
3.61
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.23
96.23
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.48
Phillip Evans
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.802
2.802
Ray Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.667