Matt Erickson vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .167). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Matt Erickson and Unknown Proctor
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
14.97
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
100
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.117
0.117
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
7.84
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Matt Erickson and Unknown Proctor
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.75
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0