Matt Erickson vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Matt Erickson. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .333) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .167). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Matt Erickson and Jim McLeod
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
14.97
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.117
0.117
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
7.84
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Matt Erickson and Jim McLeod
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
6
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Matt Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7