Jim Eppard vs. Nate Schierholtz — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Eppard and Nate Schierholtz are closely matched on the surface stats. Nate Schierholtz posted stronger numbers in OPS (.712 vs .667) and slugging (.405 vs .317). Jim Eppard had the advantage in on-base percentage (.351 vs .307). By the career numbers, Nate Schierholtz had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Eppard and Nate Schierholtz
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
82
315.38
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
799
210.73
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
156
600
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
2275
600
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
139
534.62
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
2090
551.21
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.689
0.689
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.724
0.724
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
35
134.62
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
337
88.88
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
4
15.38
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
192
50.64
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.103
0.103
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.363
0.363
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.025
0.025
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
14.55
55.96
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
261.58
68.99
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
44
169.23
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
847
223.38
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
54
207.69
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
686
180.92
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.302
0.302
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.405
0.405
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.707
0.707
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.036
0.036
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.152
0.152
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.562
0.562
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.642
0.642
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.331
0.331
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
25
96.15
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
414
109.19
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
17.72
68.16
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
263.01
69.37
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
1
3.85
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
23
6.07
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
21
80.77
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
408
107.6
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
7.43
7.43
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
5.58
5.58
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.69
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
3
0.79
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 600 PA
5
19.23
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 600 PA
27
7.12
Fielding Stats for Jim Eppard and Nate Schierholtz
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
1.53
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
649
1.26
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
1.09
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
471
0.92
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
495
27
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
13876
27
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
165
9
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4625.1
9
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
76
4.15
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1009
1.96
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.22
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
0.08
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.11
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
0.02
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
4.47
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1061
2.06
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
4.36
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1050
2.04
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.56
97.56
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.96
98.96
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.857
2.857
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.618
1.618
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
71.43
71.43
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
72.57
72.57
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.22
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
0.02
Jim Eppard
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Nate Schierholtz
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0