Frank Edington vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .339). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Frank Edington and Unknown Proctor
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
15
152.54
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
59
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
0.737
0.737
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
6.79
69.04
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
19
193.22
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
0.339
0.339
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
8.25
83.9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
59
59
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Frank Edington
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Frank Edington and Unknown Proctor
Frank Edington
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Frank Edington
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Frank Edington
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0