Zeb Eaton vs. Paul Gibson — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Zeb Eaton and Paul Gibson are fairly close on the surface numbers. Paul Gibson posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.07 vs 4.43) and WHIP (1.525 vs 1.667). Zeb Eaton had the advantage in home runs allowed (0.26 per nine innings vs 0.89). By the career numbers, Paul Gibson had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.