Paul Easterling vs. Jim Gladd — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul Easterling posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Gladd. Paul Easterling posted stronger numbers in OPS (.739 vs .258) and on-base percentage (.329 vs .167). By the career numbers, Paul Easterling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Paul Easterling and Jim Gladd
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
76
208.22
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
4
200
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
219
600
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.749
0.749
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
27.33
74.88
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
9.01
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
71
194.52
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
2
100
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.329
0.329
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.41
0.41
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.098
0.098
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
0.68
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.336
0.336
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
4.98
4.98
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Paul Easterling and Jim Gladd
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
105
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
Paul Easterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.75
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
100