Scott Dunn vs. John McFarland — Career Comparison

John McFarland built a career as a starting pitcher and Scott Dunn as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Scott Dunn posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 10.97 and WHIP 2.719 compared to 12.24 and 2.520 for John McFarland. By the career numbers, Scott Dunn had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.