Matt Duff vs. Al Tate — Career Comparison
Al Tate built a career as a starting pitcher and Matt Duff as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Matt Duff posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 4.76 and WHIP 2.294 compared to 5 and 1.667 for Al Tate. By the career numbers, Matt Duff had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.
Pitching Stats for Matt Duff and Al Tate
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.63
3.63
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.38
4.38
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.82
5.82
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.89
4.89
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.15
0.15
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.25
0.25
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.76
4.76
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
8
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
12.71
12.71
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
7
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.35
6.35
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.57
0.57
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.118
2.118
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.76
4.76
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.43
0.43
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.188
0.188
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.267
0.267
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
44.47
44.47
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
39
Fielding Stats for Matt Duff and Al Tate
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
11.12
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Matt Duff
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Al Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
100