Cameron Drew vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Cameron Drew and Leo Smith are closely matched on the surface stats. Leo Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.283 vs .188). Cameron Drew had the advantage in slugging (.313 vs .250). By the career numbers, Leo Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Cameron Drew and Leo Smith
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
127
600
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.98
36.58
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Fielding Stats for Cameron Drew and Leo Smith
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.23
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
36.2
9
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
294
9
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
2.45
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
191
5.85
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
2.45
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
181
5.54
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76
Cameron Drew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.171
5.171