Tom Dodd vs. Ed McFarland — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tom Dodd posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McFarland. Tom Dodd posted stronger numbers in OPS (.837 vs .704) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .335). Ed McFarland had the advantage in batting average (.275 vs .231). By the career numbers, Tom Dodd had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Dodd and Ed McFarland
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3364
600
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.844
0.844
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.736
0.736
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.252
0.252
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.077
0.077
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.004
0.004
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.016
0.016
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
2.15
80.77
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
400.99
71.52
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.335
0.335
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.462
0.462
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.818
0.818
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.663
0.663
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
2.18
81.84
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
442.02
78.84
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
19.33
19.33
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1.46
1.46
Fielding Stats for Tom Dodd and Ed McFarland
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.08
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
849
1.06
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
851
1.06