Tom Dodd vs. Gordon MacKenzie — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tom Dodd posted the stronger offensive profile against Gordon MacKenzie. Tom Dodd posted stronger numbers in OPS (.837 vs .285) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .160). By the career numbers, Tom Dodd had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Dodd and Gordon MacKenzie
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
25
600
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.844
0.844
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
2.15
80.77
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
7.11
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.16
0.16
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.462
0.462
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.103
0.103
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.818
0.818
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
4.17
4.17
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 600 PA
1
24
Fielding Stats for Tom Dodd and Gordon MacKenzie
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.08
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.34
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
27
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 9 Innings
141
27
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.1
9
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 9 Innings
47
9
Tom Dodd
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Gordon MacKenzie
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.19