Shorty Dee vs. Cedric Hunter — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Cedric Hunter posted the stronger offensive profile against Shorty Dee. Cedric Hunter posted stronger numbers in OPS (.355 vs .250) and slugging (.184 vs .000). Shorty Dee had the advantage in on-base percentage (.250 vs .171). By the career numbers, Cedric Hunter had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Shorty Dee and Cedric Hunter
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
41
600
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.113
0.113
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.123
0.123
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
6.83
6.83
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
1
14.63
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
1
14.63
Fielding Stats for Shorty Dee and Cedric Hunter
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.48
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
1.91
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.286
1.286