Shorty Dee vs. Leo Foster — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Leo Foster posted the stronger offensive profile against Shorty Dee. Leo Foster posted stronger numbers in OPS (.517 vs .250) and on-base percentage (.265 vs .250). By the career numbers, Leo Foster had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Shorty Dee and Leo Foster
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.113
0.113
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
0.438
0.438
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
6
12.46
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Leo Foster
Career
Per 600 PA
10
20.76
Fielding Stats for Shorty Dee and Leo Foster
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Leo Foster
Career
Per 9 Innings
110
1.61
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Leo Foster
Career
Per 9 Innings
299
4.38
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
Leo Foster
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.53
95.53