Jaff Decker vs. Fuzzy Walton — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jaff Decker posted the stronger offensive profile against Fuzzy Walton. Jaff Decker posted stronger numbers in OPS (.510 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.274 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jaff Decker had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jaff Decker and Fuzzy Walton
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
191
600
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.565
0.565
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
11.7
36.75
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
3.21
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
0.46
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
4.06
4.06
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
2
6.28
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jaff Decker and Fuzzy Walton
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
1.24
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
38
0.92
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1110
27
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
27
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
97
2.36
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
2.26
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.88
95.88
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.824
1.824
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
74.51
74.51
Fuzzy Walton
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100