John Deasley vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .229). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Deasley and Unknown Proctor
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
44
147.49
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
179
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.472
0.472
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
41
137.43
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
10.24
34.32
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
John Deasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for John Deasley and Unknown Proctor
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
1.13
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1056
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
352
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
157
4.01
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.51
83.51
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
John Deasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0