Quack Davis vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Quack Davis posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Quack Davis posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.071 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .248). By the career numbers, Quack Davis had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Quack Davis and Jim McLeod
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
1.212
1.212
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
2.44
183.15
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.368
0.368
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
1.75
1.75
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
2.29
172.05
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
2
150
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Quack Davis
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Quack Davis and Jim McLeod
Quack Davis
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Quack Davis
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Quack Davis
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Quack Davis
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442