Lum Davenport vs. Nathan Wiles — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Lum Davenport and Nathan Wiles are fairly close on the surface numbers. Lum Davenport posted stronger numbers in ERA (7.71 vs 27) and WHIP (1.954 vs 4.000). Nathan Wiles had the advantage in home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.46). By the career numbers, Lum Davenport had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.