Ike Danning vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ike Danning posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ike Danning posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.071 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.571 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ike Danning had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ike Danning and Jim McLeod
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
1.071
1.071
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
1.91
163.98
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
4
342.86
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.382
0.382
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
1.333
1.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
1.94
166.35
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
3.5
3.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ike Danning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Fielding Stats for Ike Danning and Jim McLeod
Ike Danning
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ike Danning
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7