Buck Danner vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Buck Danner posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Buck Danner posted stronger numbers in OPS (.500 vs .485) and slugging (.250 vs .237). By the career numbers, Buck Danner had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Buck Danner and Jim McLeod
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.568
0.568
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1.04
51.86
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
12
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Buck Danner and Jim McLeod
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7