Lunie Danage vs. Jim Gill — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Lunie Danage and Jim Gill are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Gill posted stronger numbers in OPS (.708 vs .614) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .299). Lunie Danage had the advantage in batting average (.258 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Gill had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Lunie Danage and Jim Gill
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.258
0.258
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.657
0.657
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.804
0.804
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
0.553
0.553
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
22.69
66.74
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
80.41
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
7
20.59
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1
66.67
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Lunie Danage and Jim Gill
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1.09
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 9 Innings
214
4.4
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
3.86
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 9 Innings
202
4.15
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.43
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.39
94.39
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Lunie Danage
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.811
3.811
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4