Jermaine Curtis vs. Carlos Ruiz — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Carlos Ruiz posted the stronger offensive profile against Jermaine Curtis. Carlos Ruiz posted stronger numbers in OPS (.751 vs .400) and slugging (.391 vs .000). Jermaine Curtis had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .360). By the career numbers, Carlos Ruiz had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jermaine Curtis and Carlos Ruiz
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
1137
167.66
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
4069
600
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.762
0.762
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
16.4
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
501.27
73.92
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
1416
208.8
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.695
0.695
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
40.16
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
507.87
74.89
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
8.15
8.15
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.81
0.81
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 600 PA
106
15.63
Fielding Stats for Jermaine Curtis and Carlos Ruiz
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
4.5
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1089
1.1
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
27
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
26848
27
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
9
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
8949.1
9
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.36
99.36
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
612
0.62
Jermaine Curtis
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Carlos Ruiz
Career
Per 9 Innings
230
0.23