John Curran vs. Dee Walsh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Curran posted the stronger offensive profile against Dee Walsh. John Curran posted stronger numbers in OPS (.750 vs .517) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .292). By the career numbers, John Curran had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Curran and Dee Walsh
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.576
0.576
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.136
0.136
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.031
0.031
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.487
0.487
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
1.79
89.27
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
18.29
41.74
Fielding Stats for John Curran and Dee Walsh
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.75
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
54.55
54.55
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.36