John Curran vs. Nat McClinic — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Curran posted the stronger offensive profile against Nat McClinic. John Curran posted stronger numbers in OPS (.750 vs .143) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .143). By the career numbers, John Curran had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Curran and Nat McClinic
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
1.55
77.49
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
0.02
1.54
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Fielding Stats for John Curran and Nat McClinic
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.75
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
108
27
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
27
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
5.5
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
3
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
54.55
54.55
Nat McClinic
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100