John Curran vs. Jim Long — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Curran posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Long. John Curran posted stronger numbers in OPS (.750 vs .565) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .286). Jim Long had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, John Curran had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Curran and Jim Long
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.653
0.653
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.604
0.604
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
1.79
89.27
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
27.23
59.2
Fielding Stats for John Curran and Jim Long
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.75
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
61
1.03
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
5.5
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
145
2.44
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
3
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
129
2.17
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
54.55
54.55
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.97
88.97
John Curran
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.115
2.115