Tom Crooke vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .290). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Crooke and Unknown Proctor
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
33
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
0.645
0.645
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
9
163.64
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
2.83
51.38
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
6.6
6.6
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Tom Crooke and Unknown Proctor
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.07
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 9 Innings
201
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 9 Innings
67
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Tom Crooke
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0