Mark Creegan vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .176). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mark Creegan and Unknown Proctor
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
9
158.82
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
34
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
14.69
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
105.88
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.117
0.117
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
8.33
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Mark Creegan and Unknown Proctor
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
1.27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 9 Innings
255
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 9 Innings
85
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Creegan
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0