Connie Creeden vs. Harry Taylor — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Harry Taylor posted the stronger offensive profile against Connie Creeden. Harry Taylor posted stronger numbers in OPS (.689 vs .650) and slugging (.322 vs .250). Connie Creeden had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .367). By the career numbers, Harry Taylor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and Harry Taylor
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
438
132.79
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
1979
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.751
0.751
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.002
0.002
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
253.05
76.72
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
565
171.3
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
727
220.41
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.717
0.717
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.296
0.296
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
484
146.74
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
285.87
86.67
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
30.92
30.92
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Harry Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0