Connie Creeden vs. Steve Staggs — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Steve Staggs posted the stronger offensive profile against Connie Creeden. Steve Staggs posted stronger numbers in OPS (.700 vs .650) and slugging (.350 vs .250). Connie Creeden had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .351). By the career numbers, Steve Staggs had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and Steve Staggs
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
119
166.82
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
428
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.716
0.716
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.005
0.005
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
47.4
66.45
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
129
180.84
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
149
208.88
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.245
0.245
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.661
0.661
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
73
102.34
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
50.93
71.39
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
7.78
7.78
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Steve Staggs
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2.8