Connie Creeden vs. John McKelvey — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Creeden posted the stronger offensive profile against John McKelvey. Connie Creeden posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .504) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .249). By the career numbers, Connie Creeden had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and John McKelvey
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
43
133.68
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
193
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.521
0.521
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
11.64
36.2
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
48
149.22
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
48
149.22
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.249
0.249
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.381
0.381
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
36
111.92
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
13.46
41.84
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
24.13
24.13
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
1
3.11