Connie Creeden vs. Scott Hemond — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Connie Creeden and Scott Hemond are closely matched on the surface stats. Connie Creeden posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .621) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .295). Scott Hemond had the advantage in slugging (.326 vs .250). By the career numbers, Connie Creeden had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and Scott Hemond
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
298
260.26
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
687
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.66
0.66
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
61.15
53.4
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
198
172.93
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
200
174.67
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.326
0.326
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.572
0.572
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
125
109.17
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
58.1
50.74
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
4.24
4.24
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Scott Hemond
Career
Per 600 PA
17
14.85