Connie Creeden vs. John Hawkins — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Creeden posted the stronger offensive profile against John Hawkins. Connie Creeden posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .322) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .231). By the career numbers, Connie Creeden had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and John Hawkins
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
4
184.62
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
13
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
13.72
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
3
138.46
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.127
0.127
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
2
92.31
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
10.84
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John Hawkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0