Connie Creeden vs. John Glenn — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Connie Creeden and John Glenn are closely matched on the surface stats. John Glenn posted stronger numbers in slugging (.311 vs .250) and batting average (.267 vs .250). Connie Creeden had the advantage in OPS (.650 vs .596). By the career numbers, John Glenn had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and John Glenn
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
315
134.33
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
1407
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
116.83
49.82
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.285
0.285
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.311
0.311
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.468
0.468
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
391
166.74
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
138.67
59.14
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
42.64
42.64
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
9
3.84