Connie Creeden vs. Chris Fulmer — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Connie Creeden and Chris Fulmer are closely matched on the surface stats. Chris Fulmer posted stronger numbers in slugging (.313 vs .250) and home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). Connie Creeden had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .343). By the career numbers, Chris Fulmer had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and Chris Fulmer
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
252
150.6
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
1004
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.736
0.736
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.001
0.001
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
123.23
73.64
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
274
163.75
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
344
205.58
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.724
0.724
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
260
155.38
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
129.03
77.11
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
15.45
15.45
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chris Fulmer
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0