Connie Creeden vs. Mike Frank — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Creeden posted the stronger offensive profile against Mike Frank. Connie Creeden posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .570) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .278). Mike Frank had the advantage in slugging (.292 vs .250). By the career numbers, Connie Creeden had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and Mike Frank
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
28
171.43
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
98
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.597
0.597
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
6.88
42.15
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
27
165.31
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.198
0.198
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
0.458
0.458
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
21
128.57
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
7.07
43.27
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
8.17
8.17
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mike Frank
Career
Per 600 PA
3
18.37