Connie Creeden vs. John Curran — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Curran posted the stronger offensive profile against Connie Creeden. John Curran posted stronger numbers in OPS (.750 vs .650) and slugging (.417 vs .250). Connie Creeden had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .333). By the career numbers, John Curran had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Creeden and John Curran
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
1.55
77.49
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
1.79
89.27
Connie Creeden
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John Curran
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0