Jim Cox vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Cox posted the stronger offensive profile against Hal Quick. Jim Cox posted stronger numbers in OPS (.576 vs .547) and slugging (.293 vs .268). Hal Quick had the advantage in batting average (.244 vs .215). By the career numbers, Jim Cox had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cox and Hal Quick
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.078
0.078
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.198
0.198
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.476
0.476
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
7.89
7.89
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
10
17.29
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Jim Cox and Hal Quick
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
98
1.15
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.87
96.87
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73