Jim Cox vs. Red Hale — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Red Hale posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cox. Red Hale posted stronger numbers in OPS (.790 vs .576) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .283). By the career numbers, Red Hale had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cox and Red Hale
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.815
0.815
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.414
0.414
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.01
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.027
0.027
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.046
0.046
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.103
0.103
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.078
0.078
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.198
0.198
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
7.89
7.89
Red Hale
Career
Per 600 PA
61.5
61.5
Fielding Stats for Jim Cox and Red Hale
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
98
1.15
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
1.12
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
88
1.04
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
1.12
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
464
5.47
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
128
4.61
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.87
96.87
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.07
87.07
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.735
4.735
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.129
4.129
Jim Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.8
89.8
Red Hale
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100