Henry Cote vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Henry Cote posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Henry Cote posted stronger numbers in OPS (.766 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .248). By the career numbers, Henry Cote had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Henry Cote and Jim McLeod
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.297
0.297
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.823
0.823
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
27
218.92
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.391
0.391
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.822
0.822
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
11.76
95.38
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
8.22
8.22
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
0.89
0.89
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
4
32.43
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Henry Cote
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Henry Cote and Jim McLeod
Henry Cote
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
1.11
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Henry Cote
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7