Tim Costo vs. Dee Walsh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tim Costo posted the stronger offensive profile against Dee Walsh. Tim Costo posted stronger numbers in OPS (.610 vs .517) and slugging (.343 vs .226). Dee Walsh had the advantage in on-base percentage (.292 vs .267). By the career numbers, Tim Costo had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tim Costo and Dee Walsh
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.634
0.634
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.576
0.576
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.136
0.136
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.031
0.031
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.505
0.505
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.487
0.487
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
11.71
48.11
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
18.29
41.74
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
6.35
6.35
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
6.58
6.58
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
0.39
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
0.55
Fielding Stats for Tim Costo and Dee Walsh
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
1.2
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
146
4.18
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
225
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.32
99.32
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.36
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.476
3.476
Dee Walsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.813