Tim Costo vs. Junior Scales — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tim Costo posted the stronger offensive profile against Junior Scales. Tim Costo posted stronger numbers in OPS (.610 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.267 vs .100). By the career numbers, Tim Costo had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tim Costo and Junior Scales
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
146
600
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.634
0.634
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
12.16
49.96
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
5.34
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.505
0.505
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
6.35
6.35
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
5
20.55
Junior Scales
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Tim Costo and Junior Scales
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
1.2
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.17
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
1.06
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.17
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
147
4.21
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.13
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
146
4.18
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.13
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.32
99.32
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.476
3.476
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.667
2.667
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.1
88.1
Junior Scales
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100