Jim Cook vs. Thomas Neal — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Thomas Neal posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Thomas Neal posted stronger numbers in OPS (.454 vs .434) and slugging (.211 vs .192). By the career numbers, Thomas Neal had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Thomas Neal
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.476
0.476
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.026
0.026
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.344
0.344
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
1.71
25.05
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
4.1
4.1
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Thomas Neal
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
1.29
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
2.36
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
2.25
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.45
95.45
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
Thomas Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.75
1.75