Jim Cook vs. John Munce — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Cook and John Munce are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Cook posted stronger numbers in OPS (.434 vs .418) and on-base percentage (.241 vs .227). John Munce had the advantage in batting average (.190 vs .154). By the career numbers, Jim Cook had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and John Munce
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.432
0.432
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
John Munce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and John Munce
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
John Munce
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.21
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
John Munce
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.04
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
John Munce
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
John Munce
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.857
0.857