Jim Cook vs. Pete Milne — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Milne posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Pete Milne posted stronger numbers in OPS (.648 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.281 vs .241). By the career numbers, Pete Milne had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Pete Milne
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.656
0.656
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.133
0.133
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.553
0.553
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
4.92
4.92
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Pete Milne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Pete Milne
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Pete Milne
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Pete Milne
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.24