Jim Cook vs. Jim McNamara — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McNamara posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Jim McNamara posted stronger numbers in OPS (.540 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.281 vs .241). By the career numbers, Jim McNamara had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Jim McNamara
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
0.21
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.551
0.551
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.264
0.264
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.049
0.049
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
5.87
39.55
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
3.42
3.42
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Jim McNamara
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
1.42
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
152
6.34
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
151
6.3
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.34
99.34
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
Jim McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.441
4.441