Jim Cook vs. John McFarlin — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Cook and John McFarlin are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Cook posted stronger numbers in OPS (.434 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.241 vs .200). John McFarlin had the advantage in batting average (.200 vs .154). By the career numbers, Jim Cook had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and John McFarlin
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
23.33
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and John McFarlin
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.04
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
11.77
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
11.42
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.06
97.06
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
11