Jim Cook vs. Connie Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Connie Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.604 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.305 vs .241). By the career numbers, Connie Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Connie Mack
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.656
0.656
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.574
0.574
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
319.33
64.97
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
23.22
23.22
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1.34
1.34
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
127
25.84
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Connie Mack
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
729
1.06
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4556
6.64
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4238
6.18
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.02
93.02
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.813
5.813