Jim Cook vs. Horatio Lamar — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Horatio Lamar posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Horatio Lamar posted stronger numbers in OPS (.675 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.300 vs .241). Jim Cook had the advantage in batting average (.154 vs .125). By the career numbers, Horatio Lamar had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Horatio Lamar
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
0.857
0.857
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
1.23
73.66
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
1
60
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Horatio Lamar
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.35
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
4.05
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
4.05
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Horatio Lamar
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100