Jim Cook vs. Sal Fasano — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Sal Fasano posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Sal Fasano posted stronger numbers in OPS (.688 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.296 vs .241). By the career numbers, Sal Fasano had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Sal Fasano
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.703
0.703
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
127.99
61.68
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
3.81
3.81
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
5
2.41
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
40
40
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Sal Fasano
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
423
1.26
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
3.74
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
2402
7.14
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
2371
7.05
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.71
98.71
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.5
2.5
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.605
5.605