Jim Cook vs. Tony DeFate — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Cook and Tony DeFate are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Cook posted stronger numbers in slugging (.192 vs .125) and batting average (.154 vs .125). Tony DeFate had the advantage in on-base percentage (.300 vs .241). By the career numbers, Jim Cook had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Tony DeFate
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.166
0.166
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
1.03
30.78
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
3.33
3.33
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Tony DeFate
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Tony DeFate
Career
Per 9 Innings
100